Comparing Frameworks for Analyzing Organizations in Nursing


Comparing Frameworks for Analyzing Organizations

Avedis Donabedian’s operation generated a pivotal resources of assessing constructional operation referring-to to texture, manner, and outcomes. However, it is evidently not equal to opinion soundness caution nature barely in stipulations of outcomes—the textures and manneres that facilitate these outcomes are similar as material.

In this Discussion, you cogitate multiple frameworks that can be used to dissect an construction. As you profits, cogitate how these frameworks recognize you to ponder the interplay of interdependent and amalgamateed talents and manneres that embrace the systems amid an construction, as well-behaved-behaved-behaved as the arrangements or textures that amalgamate these talents.

To prepare:

  • Investigate and consider on the systems and textures of an construction after a while which you are frank. Cogitate the aftercited:
    • What is the reporting texture?
    • Who holds stately and instately instance?
    • How sundry layers of administration are there between the frontline and the main office-holders of the construction?
    • How are interdisciplinary teams unembarrassed?
    • How is message facilitated?
    • How well-behaved-behaved-behaved integrated is resolution making discurrent clinical personnel and authoritative professionals?
    • How are detail benefit lines unembarrassed?
    • Which departments, groups, and/or beings amid the construction are under obligation for monitoring matters amalgamateed to operation, such as nature and finances?
  • Select two of the aftercited frameworks:
    • Learning constructions, presented in the Elkin, Haina, and Cone boundary
    • Complex adaptive systems (CAS), presented in the Nesse, Kutcher, Wood, and Rummans boundary
    • Clinical microsystems, presented in the Sabino, Friel, Deitrick, and Sales-Lopez boundary
    • Good to numerous, presented in the Geller boundary
    • The 5 Ps, presented in the ASHP Foundation boundary
  • Reopinion the Attainments Resources for each of the frameworks that you chosen. Also influence attached discovery to invigorate your construction of how to use each frameoperation to assess an construction.
  • Compare the two frameworks. How could each frameoperation be used to demonstrate opportunities to ameliorate operation? In detail, how would you use each of these frameworks to dissect the construction that you accept chosen?

By Day 3

Post an separation of the systems and textures of the construction you chosen, sharing inequitable examples. Teach insights that you gained by comparing the two frameworks, and how each can be used to assess an construction, demonstrate a scarcity for amelioratement, and, notwithstanding, augment the operation of an construction.

Read a segregation of your colleagues’ responses.


Required Readings

Hickey, J. V., & Brosnan, C. A. (2017). Evaluation  of soundness caution nature in for DNPs (2nd  ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Chapter 1, “Evaluation and DNPs: The Mandate for Evaluation” (pp. 3-36)
Chapter 3, “Conceptual Models for Evaluation in Advanced Nursing Practice” (pp. 61-86)
Chapter 6, “Evaluating Organizations and Systems” (pp. 127-142)Chapter 1 defines microsystem, mesosystem, and macrosystem and notes that evaluation can nucleus on one of these levels or all three. Boundary 5 ponders the evaluation of constructions and systems.
Sadeghi, S., Barzi, A., Mikhail, O., & Shabot, M. M. (2013). Integrating nature and temporization in soundness caution constructions, Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Chapter 2, “Understanding the Healthcaution Organization” (pp. 31–43)Although this boundary nucleuses on hospitals, the authors afford advice environing strategic planning and constructional texture that is ry in sundry soundness caution settings. The authors ponder financial and nature issues as key aspects of operation delineation.
Elkin, G., Zhang, H., & Cone, M. (2011). The exculpation of Senge’s attainments organisation type discurrent managers in China: An interopinion con-over. International Journal of Management, 28(4), 354–364.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

This boundary outlines the five disciplines that Senge argued could be rest in a attainments construction. The authors also sift-canvass the globeopinion that is intrinsic in transaction constructions in China and teach how this relates to Senge’s scheme.
Geller, E. S. (2006). From amiable to numerous in prophylactic: What does it transfer to be globe class? Professional Safety, 51(6), 35–40.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Geller reviews and applies Collin’s restational Amiable to Numerous scheme from its nucleus on financial achievement to prophylactic.
Nesse, R. E., Kutcher, G., Wood, D., & Rummans, T. (2010). Framing qualify for high-value soundnesscaution systems. Journal for Healthcaution Quality, 32(1), 23–28.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

This boundary explores how to instrument qualify in close adaptive systems (CAS) such as soundness caution. The authors spirit that an construction of the principles of qualify administration in CAS is precarious for achievement.