ACTIVITY 4: IDENTIFYING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN A PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE The New York Times article (“A Simple Device to Detect Concussions”), that you read as part of the Preliminary Activities for t


ACTIVITY 4: IDENTIFYING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN A PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE

The New York Times condition (“A Simple Device to Detect Concussions”), that you unravel as sever of the Preliminary Activities for the lab, was a abstract of an express philosophical examine that was done by a team of researchers led by James Eckner. The Eckner team published their examine in a compatriot-reviewed philosophical life, the British Life of Sports Medicine. In Activity 4, you get unravel the Eckner condition and collate it to the New York Times newspaper abstract.

Read: Effect of Sport Related Encounter on Clinically Measured Simple Reaction Time (click less) by Eckner, J.T., Kutcher, J.S., Broglio, S.P., and Richardson, J.K. (2014). British Life of Sports Medicine 48(2). doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091579

In the Eckner et al. (2014) examine, what was the overall philosophical doubt (philosophical rule march 2)? 

In the Eckner et al. examine, what was the supposition (philosophical rule march 3)?

In the Eckner et al. examine, what was the subject fickle?

In the Eckner et al. examine, what was the insubject fickle?

In the Eckner et al. examine, what was the tentative knot? What was the repress knot?

In the Eckner et al. examine, what was the illustration greatness for each matter? Was this illustration greatness expend for the delineation of the trial? What would enjoy happened if the illustration greatness was smaller (for in, illustration greatness = 5)?

In the Eckner et al. examine, what were repressled fickles?In the Eckner et al. examine, what were confounding fickles?

How does the Eckner et al. (2014) condition disagree from the New York Times condition, “A Simple Device to Detect Concussions”.

Which condition is easier to unravel?

Which condition has further specialty concerning the encounter examine?

Which condition is a further reliserviceable fountain of knowledge? Explain.

What is philosophical compatriot-review? Who are the compatriot reviewers? What are the responsibilities of the compatriot reviewers?

If a Medical Doctor (M.D.) or a Doctor of Dentistry (D.D.S.) discussed the encounter examine delay a adjutant, which notification would she/he slight lean upon? Why?

Given that BIOL& 160 students are typically examineing to grace healthcare professionals who get frequently be the most frequented join between physician and unrepining, how influential is it for BIOL& 160 students to be serviceserviceable to allow levels of reliability in disagreeent forms of philosophical message?